Alexander the Great 323 B.C.E.

1: Philip of Mace donica was the first king to unite the city-states of Greece.

2: Philip's son was Alexander and Will expand his empire.

3: Alexander will conquer The Persian empire all the way to India...... 30 times more land than Greece.

4: through the entire empire he spread Greek culture and blended it with Persian culture...... The new blended culture will be known as Hellenistic.

5: Alex is most famous for culture diffusion.

Ghana History

The Republic of Ghana is named after the medieval West African Ghana Empire, The Empire became known in Europe and Arabia as the Ghana Empire by the title of its emperor, the Ghana. The Empire appears to have broken up following the 1076 conquest by the Almoravid General Abu-Bakr Ibn-Umar. A reduced kingdom continued to exist after Almoravid rule ended, and the Kingdom was later incorporated into subsequent Sahelian empires, such as the Mali Empire several centuries later. Geographically, the ancient Ghana Empire was approximately 500 miles (800 km) north and west of the modern state of Ghana, and controlled territories in the area of the Sénégal river and east towards the Niger rivers, in modern Senegal, Mauritania and Mali.

Historically, modern Ghanaian territory was the core of the Empire of Ashanti, which was one of the most advanced states in sub-Sahara Africa in the 18–19th centuries, before colonial rule. It is said that at its peak, the King of Ashanti could field 500,000 troops.

For most of central sub-Saharan Africa, agricultural expansion marked the period before 500. Farming began earliest on the southern tips of the Sahara, eventually giving rise to village settlements. Toward the end of the classical era, larger regional kingdoms had formed in West Africa, one of which was the Kingdom of Ghana, north of what is today the nation of Ghana. Before its fall, at the beginning of the 10th century Akan migrants moved southward then founded several nation-states including the first great Akan empire of the Bono founded in the 11th Century and for which the Brong-Ahafo Region of Akanland is named after. Later Akan groups such as the Ashanti federation and Fante states are thought to possibly have roots in the original Bono settlement at Bono manso. Much of the area was united under the Empire of Ashanti by the 16th century. The Ashanti government operated first as a loose network and eventually as a centralized kingdom with an advanced, highly specialized bureaucracy centered in Kumasi.

By the end of the 16th century, most of the ethnic groups constituting the modern Ghanaian population had settled in their present locations. Archaeological remains found in the coastal zone indicate that the area has been inhabited since the Bronze Age (ca. 2000 BC), but these societies, based on fishing in the extensive lagoons and rivers, have left few traces. Archaeological work also suggests that central Ghana north of the forest zone was inhabited as early as 3,000 to 4,000 years ago. Oral history and other sources suggest that the ancestors of Ghana's residents, the Akan entered the area at least as early as the 10th century AD, and that migration from the north by the Dagomba continued thereafter.

These migrations resulted in part from the formation and disintegration of a series of large states in the western Sudan (the region north of modern Ghana drained by the Niger River). Strictly speaking, ghana was the title of the king, but the Arabs, who left records of the kingdom, applied the term to the king, the capital, and the state. The 9th-century Berber historian/geographer Al Yaqubi described ancient Ghana as one of the three most organized states in the region (the others being Gao and Kanem in the central Sudan). Its rulers were renowned for their wealth in gold, the opulence of their courts, and their warrior/hunting skills. They were also masters of the trade in gold, which drew North African merchants to the western Sudan. The military achievements of these and later western Sudanic rulers, and their control over the region's gold mines, constituted the nexus of their historical relations with merchants and rulers in North Africa and the Mediterranean.

Ghana succumbed to attacks by its neighbors in the 11th century, but its name and reputation endured. In 1957, when the leaders of the former British colony of the Gold Coast sought an appropriate name for their newly independent state—the first black African nation to gain its independence from colonial rule—they named their new country after ancient Ghana. The choice was more than merely symbolic, because modern Ghana, like its namesake, was equally famed for its wealth and trade in gold.

Although none of the states of the western Sudan controlled territories in the area that is modern Ghana, several small kingdoms that later developed such as Bonoman, were ruled by nobles believed to have immigrated from that region. The trans-Saharan trade that contributed to the expansion of kingdoms in the western Sudan also led to the development of contacts with regions in northern modern Ghana, and in the forest to the south.

The growth of trade stimulated the development of early Akan states located on the trade route to the goldfields, in the forest zone of the south. The forest itself was thinly populated, but Akan-speaking peoples began to move into it toward the end of the 15th century, with the arrival of crops from Southeast Asia and the New World that could be adapted to forest conditions. These new crops included sorghum, bananas, and cassava. By the beginning of the 16th century, European sources noted the existence of the gold-rich states of Akan and Twifu in the Ofin River Valley.

It seems clear from oral traditions, as well as from archaeological evidence, that after the establishment of the Akan kingdom states in the 11th century, the Dagomba states, was the earliest kingdom to emerge in modern Ghana, being well established by the close of the 16th century.Although the rulers of the Dagomba states were not usually Muslim, they brought with them, or welcomed, Muslims as scribes and medicine men. As a result of their presence, Islam influenced the north. Muslim influence, spread by the activities of merchants and clerics. In the broad belt of rugged country between the northern boundaries of the Muslim-influenced state of Dagomba, and the southernmost outposts of the Mossi kingdoms (of what is today the southern Burkina Faso and northern Ghana border), were peoples who were not incorporated into the Dagomba entity. Among these peoples were the Kassena agriculturalists. They lived in a so-called segmented society, bound together by kinship tie, and ruled by the head of their clan. Trade between Akan kingdoms and the Mossi kingdoms to the north (of what is today the northern Ghana and southern Burkina Faso border) flowed through their homeland, subjecting them to Islamic influence, and to the depredations of these more powerful neighbors.

Athenian and Sparta

 How is Athenian democracy different from modern American democracy?

 

                                      Athenian democracy                             America 50 states

1. Athenians were divided into 10 tribes, however Americans are divided into 50 states 2. Athenians elected 50 men from each tribe, however Americans elect by population 3. Athenians had a direct democracy (participated directly), however Americans have a representative deomcracy (elect representatives) 4. Athenians had the Council of Five Hundred, however Americans have the Government 5. Athenians limited electing and voting rights to just men, however Americans have electing and voting rights to men and women 6. Athenians had slaves, however Americans don't have slaves (well, they used to until 1863 when all of the slaves were freed by Abraham Lincoln) 7. In Athens, women stayed at home and work, however in America, women participate in all kinds of daily activities, even in the Army 8. In Athens, slaves were just captured war prisoners, however in America, slaves were Africans who were treated as property due to their dark skin.

How would you compare the ideals of spartan and Athenian societies?

                        

                     Sparta society                                                Athen society


The Spartans were more of a warrior and practical society while the Athenians were a more philosophical society who held education in high regard. They were both good fighter but Sparta was obviously better (Peloponnesian War) Both sides were also very intelligent but Athens dominated in that section Values: S: Strength, A: Smarts Governments: S: Oligarchy, A: Democracy Lifestyles: Same as Values


How did the Persian wars affect the Greek people especially the Athenian?

                                 
       greek after war                                                        greek and Persians at war

   

         

Early on in the Fifth Centruy B.C., the Greeks defeated the Persians, which victory allow Athens to flourish as a center of culture and political power among the 1500 or so Greek city states. This was the golden age of Athens, which resulted in the development of Greek democracy, architecture, sculpture, theater. Athens also became an empirical power and forced many Greek city states to pay tribute. Athens became wealthy with this tribute, but it was the fear of this every expanding empire that drove Sparta to lead a coalition against Athens and to initiate the long war known as the Peloponesian war, which dominated Greece during the last 30 years or so of the Fifth century. For years the war was a stalement without a defining conclusion. Eventually the Athenians were defeated owing to the huge financial aid given to the Spartan cause by the Persians. Athens would never again assume its Fifth Century cultural dominance and its political dominance in the Grecian world . Thus Persia, by losing a war and later by winning one, was pivotal both in the rise of Athens and its decline.

MAIN IDEAS

How does an aristocracy differ from an oligarchy?

                           
         Aristocracy                                                                  oligarchy

Oligarchy is a form of government where power is held by a small number of individuals from a elite or noble families. On the other hand, an aristocracy is a group of aristocratic ruling class.An aristocracy and an oligarchy have very similar features, yet their origins are different. In an aristocracy, the nobles are born into their position by royalty. In an oligarchy, the nobles r men of high position are there not because of birth rights but because of their financial position.



What contributions did Solon and Cleisthenes make to the development of Athenian democracy?

                             
                  Solon                                                            Cleisthenes

Solon outlaw debt slavery, and introduced legal concept that any citizen could bring charges against wrongdoers. Cleisthenes broke up the power of nobility by organizing citizens into ten groups based on where they lived rather than wealth. He increased the power of assembly by allowing all citizens to submit laws for debt and passage.


How did Athens benefit from victory in the Persian wars?

                                           
              Athenian coin                                                                     extanded land

Athens benefited from victory in the Persian Wars because they gained a lot of land. They also gained a large amount of prestige. It converted the anti-Persian league it had headed into an empire of its own, and turned its revenues to its own benefit.